Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Compact wheel loader

Volvo L25 Electric vs Wacker Neuson WL52

The Volvo L25 Electric is about 5% heavier than the Wacker Neuson WL52 (5,000 vs 4,750 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Volvo Construction Equipment and Wacker Neuson in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Volvo L25 Electric compact wheel loader
Volvo Construction Equipment Volvo L25 Electric
Wacker Neuson compact wheel loader on display
Wacker Neuson Wacker Neuson WL52
Operating weight 5,000 kg (11,000 lb)4,750 kg (10,500 lb)
Engine power ——
Battery Lithium-ion, ≈40 kWh—
Emissions at point of use Zero—
Bucket capacity —≈0.75 m³ (1 yd³)
Drive —Hydrostatic
Strengths
  • + Zero emissions and very low noise
  • + Low running costs
  • + Good for indoor and urban work
  • + Compact and agile
  • + Good value
  • + Wide attachment range
Watch-outs
  • − Higher purchase price
  • − Runtime depends on duty cycle
  • − Smaller dealer network in North America
Full L25 Electric reviewFull WL52 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.