Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Mini excavator

Bobcat E35 vs Caterpillar 302.7 CR

The Bobcat E35 is about 27% heavier than the Caterpillar 302.7 CR (3,550 vs 2,800 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Bobcat E35 has about 6% more engine power (18 kW (24 hp) vs 17 kW (23 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Bobcat and Caterpillar in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Bobcat E35 compact excavator
Bobcat Bobcat E35
Caterpillar 302.7 CR mini excavator
Caterpillar Caterpillar 302.7 CR
Operating weight 3,550 kg (7,800 lb)2,800 kg (6,200 lb)
Engine power 18 kW (24 hp)17 kW (23 hp)
Engine power ≈18 kW (25 hp)—
Max. digging depth ≈3.1 m (10 ft)≈2.8 m (9 ft 2 in)
Tail swing Zero tail swing—
Width ≈1.7 m (5 ft 8 in)—
Emissions EPA Tier 4 / EU Stage V (by market)—
Net power —≈17 kW (23 hp)
Strengths
  • + Zero tail swing for work beside walls and traffic
  • + Wide range of Bobcat attachments
  • + Strong dealer network in North America and Europe
  • + Easy to transport
  • + Compact radius
  • + Comfortable cab option
Watch-outs
  • − Engine is modest for heavy attachments
  • − Less stable over the side than conventional-tail machines
  • − Heavier trailer needed than 1.7 t class
Full E35 reviewFull 302.7 CR review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.