Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Mini excavator

Bobcat E35 vs Caterpillar 303.5 CR

The Caterpillar 303.5 CR is about 3% heavier than the Bobcat E35 (3,650 vs 3,550 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Bobcat and Caterpillar in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Bobcat E35 compact excavator
Bobcat Bobcat E35
Caterpillar 303.5 CR
Caterpillar Caterpillar 303.5 CR
Operating weight 3,550 kg (7,800 lb)3,650 kg (8,000 lb)
Engine power 18 kW (24 hp)18 kW (24 hp)
Engine power ≈18 kW (25 hp)—
Max. digging depth ≈3.1 m (10 ft)≈3.1 m (10 ft 2 in)
Tail swing Zero tail swing—
Width ≈1.7 m (5 ft 8 in)—
Emissions EPA Tier 4 / EU Stage V (by market)—
Net power —≈17.9 kW (24 hp)
Strengths
  • + Zero tail swing for work beside walls and traffic
  • + Wide range of Bobcat attachments
  • + Strong dealer network in North America and Europe
  • + Easy to transport
  • + Stick steer travel
  • + Good stability for its size
Watch-outs
  • − Engine is modest for heavy attachments
  • − Less stable over the side than conventional-tail machines
  • − Engine modest for heavy attachments
Full E35 reviewFull 303.5 CR review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.