Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Mini excavator

Bobcat E35 vs Volvo EC60E

The Volvo EC60E is about 73% heavier than the Bobcat E35 (6,150 vs 3,550 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Volvo EC60E has about 122% more engine power (40 kW (54 hp) vs 18 kW (24 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Bobcat and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Bobcat E35 compact excavator
Bobcat Bobcat E35
Volvo EC60E
Volvo Construction Equipment Volvo EC60E
Operating weight 3,550 kg (7,800 lb)6,150 kg (13,600 lb)
Engine power 18 kW (24 hp)40 kW (54 hp)
Engine power ≈18 kW (25 hp)≈40 kW (54 hp)
Max. digging depth ≈3.1 m (10 ft)—
Tail swing Zero tail swing—
Width ≈1.7 m (5 ft 8 in)—
Emissions EPA Tier 4 / EU Stage V (by market)—
Strengths
  • + Zero tail swing for work beside walls and traffic
  • + Wide range of Bobcat attachments
  • + Strong dealer network in North America and Europe
  • + Easy to transport
  • + Stable and strong
  • + Comfortable cab
Watch-outs
  • − Engine is modest for heavy attachments
  • − Less stable over the side than conventional-tail machines
  • − Conventional tail needs space
Full E35 reviewFull EC60E review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.