Comparison · Mini excavator
Bobcat E35 vs Volvo ECR25 Electric
The Bobcat E35 is about 34% heavier than the Volvo ECR25 Electric (3,474 vs 2,600 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Bobcat and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 3,474 kg (7,700 lb) | 2,600 kg (5,700 lb) |
| Engine power | 19 kW (25 hp) | — |
| Engine power | 18.5 kW (24.8 hp); optional ≈24.6 kW (33 hp) | — |
| Max. dig depth | 3.11 m (10 ft 2 in), standard arm | 2.67–2.97 m (8 ft 9 in–9 ft 9 in) |
| Max. reach at ground level | 5.24 m (17 ft 2 in) | — |
| Bucket digging force | 31.0 kN (6,968 lbf) | — |
| Arm digging force | 21.6 kN (4,859 lbf), standard arm | — |
| Auxiliary flow | 64 L/min (16.9 US gal/min) standard | — |
| Tail swing | Zero tail swing | Short swing radius (ECR) |
| Arm options | Standard, long and extendable arms | — |
| Battery (new generation) | — | 40 kWh lithium-ion |
| Battery (first generation) | — | ≈20 kWh |
| Electric motor (first generation) | — | 18 kW peak |
| Runtime | — | Up to 8 hours / a full working day, depending on application |
| Charging | — | On-board charger plus faster charging options (new generation) |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full E35 review | Full ECR25 Electric review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.