Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Mini excavator

Bobcat E35 vs Wacker Neuson ET65

The Wacker Neuson ET65 is about 83% heavier than the Bobcat E35 (6,500 vs 3,550 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Wacker Neuson ET65 has about 139% more engine power (43 kW (58 hp) vs 18 kW (24 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Bobcat and Wacker Neuson in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Bobcat E35 compact excavator
Bobcat Bobcat E35
Wacker Neuson ET65
Wacker Neuson Wacker Neuson ET65
Operating weight 3,550 kg (7,800 lb)6,500 kg (14,300 lb)
Engine power 18 kW (24 hp)43 kW (58 hp)
Engine power ≈18 kW (25 hp)≈43 kW (58 hp)
Max. digging depth ≈3.1 m (10 ft)—
Tail swing Zero tail swing—
Width ≈1.7 m (5 ft 8 in)—
Emissions EPA Tier 4 / EU Stage V (by market)—
Strengths
  • + Zero tail swing for work beside walls and traffic
  • + Wide range of Bobcat attachments
  • + Strong dealer network in North America and Europe
  • + Easy to transport
  • + Stable and strong
  • + Good visibility
Watch-outs
  • − Engine is modest for heavy attachments
  • − Less stable over the side than conventional-tail machines
  • − Conventional tail needs space
Full E35 reviewFull ET65 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.