Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Compact track loader

Bobcat T770 vs Caterpillar 279D3

The Bobcat T770 has about 25% more engine power (69 kW (93 hp) vs 55 kW (74 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Bobcat and Caterpillar in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Bobcat T770 compact track loader
Bobcat Bobcat T770
Caterpillar machine similar to the Caterpillar 279D3 (related model may be pictured)
Caterpillar Caterpillar 279D3
Operating weight 4,800 kg (10,600 lb)—
Engine power 69 kW (93 hp)55 kW (74 hp)
Rated operating capacity ≈1,580 kg (3,475 lb)≈1,180 kg (2,600 lb)
Engine power ≈69 kW (92 hp)—
Lift path VerticalRadial
Engine Bobcat / Doosan 3.4 L—
Net power —≈55 kW (74 hp)
Strengths
  • + High lift capacity and strong pushing power
  • + Huge attachment ecosystem
  • + Plenty of used machines and parts
  • + Strong breakout
  • + Good for grading
Watch-outs
  • − Replaced by the R-Series T76 / T86
  • − Track and undercarriage costs are high on a heavy machine
  • − Less reach at height
Full T770 reviewFull 279D3 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.