Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Excavator

CASE CX210E vs Komatsu PC210LC-11

The CASE CX210E and Komatsu PC210LC-11 are almost identical in operating weight (about 22,500 and 22,750 kg).

The Komatsu PC210LC-11 has about 5% more engine power (123 kW (165 hp) vs 117 kW (157 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Case and Komatsu in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

CASE CX210 crawler excavator loading demolition debris (D-series pictured)
Case CASE CX210E
Komatsu PC210LC crawler excavator
Komatsu Komatsu PC210LC-11
Operating weight 22,500 kg (49,600 lb)22,750 kg (50,200 lb)
Engine power 117 kW (157 hp)123 kW (165 hp)
Net power ≈117 kW (157 hp)≈123 kW (165 hp)
Max. digging depth ≈6.7 m (22 ft)≈6.6 m (21 ft 8 in)
Engine Isuzu 4HK1Komatsu SAA4D107E-3
Bucket capacity 0.8–1.3 m³ (1.0–1.7 yd³)0.8–1.4 m³ (1.0–1.8 yd³)
Emissions EPA Tier 4 Final / EU Stage VEPA Tier 4 Final / EU Stage V (by market)
Max. reach at ground level —≈9.9 m (32 ft 6 in)
Strengths
  • + No DPF to regenerate on Tier 4 Final versions
  • + Smooth hydraulics developed with Sumitomo
  • + Usually priced below Cat and Komatsu
  • + Factory-fitted machine control options
  • + Very low fuel consumption in Economy mode
  • + Smooth, precise controls favoured by operators
  • + KOMTRAX telematics fitted as standard
  • + PC210LCi version has fully integrated iMC 3D grade control
Watch-outs
  • − Lower resale value than the market leaders
  • − Dealer density varies by region
  • − Premium price, close to Cat
  • − iMC version is significantly more expensive
  • − Dealer quality varies by region
Full CX210E reviewFull PC210LC-11 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.