Comparison · Motor grader
Caterpillar 140 vs XCMG GR215
The Caterpillar 140 is about 12% heavier than the XCMG GR215 (18,500 vs 16,500 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
Engine output is effectively the same on both machines.
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and XCMG in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 18,500 kg (40,800 lb) | 16,500 kg (36,400 lb) |
| Engine power | 158 kW (212 hp) | 160 kW (215 hp) |
| Net power | ≈140–175 kW (189–235 hp), variable | — |
| Moldboard | 3.7 m (12 ft) std; 4.3 m (14 ft) option | ≈4.0 m (13 ft) |
| Drive | 6×4 or AWD | 6×4 |
| Controls | Joystick | — |
| Engine power | — | ≈160 kW (215 hp) |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 140 review | Full GR215 review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.