Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Compact track loader

Caterpillar 299D3 vs Kubota SVL97-2

The Caterpillar 299D3 is about 4% heavier than the Kubota SVL97-2 (5,200 vs 5,000 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Caterpillar 299D3 has about 3% more engine power (73 kW (98 hp) vs 71 kW (95 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Kubota in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Caterpillar 289D compact track loader, the smaller sibling of the 299D3
Caterpillar Caterpillar 299D3
Kubota SVL97 compact track loader
Kubota Kubota SVL97-2
Operating weight 5,200 kg (11,500 lb)5,000 kg (11,000 lb)
Engine power 73 kW (98 hp)71 kW (95 hp)
Rated operating capacity ≈1,300 kg (2,900 lb) at 35% tipping load≈1,450 kg (3,200 lb)
Net power ≈73 kW (98 hp); XE versions up to ≈82 kW (110 hp)—
Lift path VerticalVertical
Engine Cat C3.8Kubota V3800 diesel
Engine power —≈71 kW (96 hp) gross
Strengths
  • + Torsion-suspended undercarriage for smooth ride
  • + High-flow XPS hydraulics on XE models
  • + Excellent operator environment
  • + Strong breakout force
  • + Kubota reliability and resale
  • + Competitive price for a large CTL
Watch-outs
  • − Premium price
  • − Heavier than most competitors
  • − Rigid undercarriage (no suspension on standard models)
  • − Cab smaller than some rivals
Full 299D3 reviewFull SVL97-2 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.