Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Excavator

Caterpillar 313 vs Volvo EC300E

The Volvo EC300E is about 128% heavier than the Caterpillar 313 (30,750 vs 13,500 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Volvo EC300E has about 140% more engine power (180 kW (241 hp) vs 75 kW (101 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Caterpillar 313 excavator
Caterpillar Caterpillar 313
Volvo EC300E
Volvo Construction Equipment Volvo EC300E
Operating weight 13,500 kg (29,800 lb)30,750 kg (67,800 lb)
Engine power 75 kW (101 hp)180 kW (241 hp)
Net power ≈75 kW (100 hp)≈180 kW (241 hp)
Max. digging depth ≈6.0 m (19 ft 8 in)≈7.3 m (24 ft)
Engine Cat C3.6—
Strengths
  • + Factory grade technology in a small excavator
  • + Easy to transport
  • + Low fuel consumption
  • + Efficient hydraulics
  • + Volvo Active Control option
Watch-outs
  • − Less lifting capacity than 20-tonne machines
  • − Dealer coverage varies
Full 313 reviewFull EC300E review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.