Comparison · Backhoe loader
Caterpillar 416 vs JCB 3CX
The JCB 3CX is about 5% heavier than the Caterpillar 416 (8,400 vs 8,000 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The JCB 3CX has about 17% more engine power (68 kW (91 hp) vs 58 kW (78 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and JCB in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 8,000 kg (17,600 lb) | 8,400 kg (18,500 lb) |
| Engine power | 58 kW (78 hp) | 68 kW (91 hp) |
| Net power | ≈52–64 kW (70–86 hp) | — |
| Max. digging depth | ≈4.4 m (14 ft 5 in) | ≈5.9 m (19 ft 4 in) with extending dipper |
| Engine power | — | ≈55–81 kW (74–109 hp), by version |
| Engine | — | JCB DieselMax 448 |
| Loader bucket | — | ≈1.0–1.3 m³ (1.3–1.7 yd³) |
| Top speed | — | ≈40 km/h (25 mph) |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 416 review | Full 3CX review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.