Comparison · Backhoe loader
Caterpillar 432 vs JCB 3CX
The Caterpillar 432 is about 7% heavier than the JCB 3CX (9,000 vs 8,400 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Caterpillar 432 has about 9% more engine power (74 kW (99 hp) vs 68 kW (91 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and JCB in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 9,000 kg (19,800 lb) | 8,400 kg (18,500 lb) |
| Engine power | 74 kW (99 hp) | 68 kW (91 hp) |
| Net power | ≈74 kW (99 hp) | — |
| Max. digging depth | ≈4.8 m (15 ft 9 in) | ≈5.9 m (19 ft 4 in) with extending dipper |
| Engine power | — | ≈55–81 kW (74–109 hp), by version |
| Engine | — | JCB DieselMax 448 |
| Loader bucket | — | ≈1.0–1.3 m³ (1.3–1.7 yd³) |
| Top speed | — | ≈40 km/h (25 mph) |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 432 review | Full 3CX review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.