Comparison · Articulated dump truck
Caterpillar 725 vs Volvo A40G
The Volvo A40G has about 48% more engine power (350 kW (469 hp) vs 236 kW (316 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | — | — |
| Engine power | 236 kW (316 hp) | 350 kW (469 hp) |
| Rated payload | ≈24,000 kg (26.5 US tons) | ≈39,000 kg (43 US tons) |
| Net power | ≈236 kW (316 hp) | ≈350 kW (469 hp) |
| Drive | 6×6 | 6×6 with automatic traction control |
| Body volume (heaped) | — | ≈24 m³ (31 yd³) |
| Engine | — | Volvo D16 |
| Top speed | — | ≈55 km/h (34 mph) |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 725 review | Full A40G review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.