Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Wheel loader

Caterpillar 926 vs Caterpillar 950 GC

The Caterpillar 950 GC is about 44% heavier than the Caterpillar 926 (18,700 vs 13,000 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Caterpillar 950 GC has about 49% more engine power (168 kW (225 hp) vs 113 kW (152 hp)).

Caterpillar 926
Caterpillar Caterpillar 926
Caterpillar 950 GC wheel loader
Caterpillar Caterpillar 950 GC
Operating weight 13,000 kg (28,700 lb)18,700 kg (41,200 lb)
Engine power 113 kW (152 hp)168 kW (225 hp)
Net power ≈113 kW (152 hp)≈168 kW (225 hp)
Bucket capacity ≈2.0–2.5 m³ (2.6–3.3 yd³)≈3.1–4.2 m³ (4.0–5.5 yd³)
Engine —Cat C7.1
Transmission —Planetary powershift
Top speed —≈40 km/h (25 mph)
Strengths
  • + Smooth hydrostatic drive
  • + Versatile linkage options
  • + Lower purchase price than the 950M
  • + Simple, proven powertrain
  • + Strong Cat dealer support and resale
Watch-outs
  • − Smaller bucket for quarry work
  • − Fewer comfort and technology features than the standard 950
  • − Not optimised for high-production quarry work
Full 926 reviewFull 950 GC review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.