Comparison · Wheel loader
Caterpillar 926 vs Caterpillar 966
The Caterpillar 966 is about 83% heavier than the Caterpillar 926 (23,750 vs 13,000 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Caterpillar 966 has about 96% more engine power (221 kW (296 hp) vs 113 kW (152 hp)).
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 13,000 kg (28,700 lb) | 23,750 kg (52,400 lb) |
| Engine power | 113 kW (152 hp) | 221 kW (296 hp) |
| Net power | ≈113 kW (152 hp) | ≈221 kW (296 hp) |
| Bucket capacity | ≈2.0–2.5 m³ (2.6–3.3 yd³) | ≈3.8–5.0 m³ (5.0–6.5 yd³) |
| Engine | — | Cat C9.3B |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 926 review | Full 966 review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.