Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Wheel loader

Caterpillar 938 vs Caterpillar 966

The Caterpillar 966 is about 48% heavier than the Caterpillar 938 (23,750 vs 16,000 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Caterpillar 966 has about 69% more engine power (221 kW (296 hp) vs 131 kW (176 hp)).

Caterpillar 938
Caterpillar Caterpillar 938
Caterpillar 966C wheel loader (an earlier generation of the 966)
Caterpillar Caterpillar 966
Operating weight 16,000 kg (35,300 lb)23,750 kg (52,400 lb)
Engine power 131 kW (176 hp)221 kW (296 hp)
Net power ≈131 kW (176 hp)≈221 kW (296 hp)
Bucket capacity ≈2.5–3.4 m³ (3.3–4.4 yd³)≈3.8–5.0 m³ (5.0–6.5 yd³)
Engine —Cat C9.3B
Strengths
  • + Versatile and efficient
  • + Payload option
  • + XE version with CVT for fuel savings
  • + Payload weighing options
  • + Strong resale
Watch-outs
  • − Not designed for heavy quarry face loading
  • − Premium price
Full 938 reviewFull 966 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.