Comparison · Wheel loader
Caterpillar 950 GC vs Caterpillar 980
The Caterpillar 980 is about 66% heavier than the Caterpillar 950 GC (31,000 vs 18,700 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Caterpillar 980 has about 64% more engine power (276 kW (370 hp) vs 168 kW (225 hp)).
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 18,700 kg (41,200 lb) | 31,000 kg (68,300 lb) |
| Engine power | 168 kW (225 hp) | 276 kW (370 hp) |
| Net power | ≈168 kW (225 hp) | ≈276 kW (370 hp) |
| Bucket capacity | ≈3.1–4.2 m³ (4.0–5.5 yd³) | ≈5.4–7.0 m³ (7.0–9.2 yd³) |
| Engine | Cat C7.1 | — |
| Transmission | Planetary powershift | — |
| Top speed | ≈40 km/h (25 mph) | — |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 950 GC review | Full 980 review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.