Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Wheel loader

Caterpillar 950 GC vs Komatsu WA200-8

The Caterpillar 950 GC is about 70% heavier than the Komatsu WA200-8 (18,700 vs 11,000 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Caterpillar 950 GC has about 77% more engine power (168 kW (225 hp) vs 95 kW (127 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Komatsu in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Caterpillar 950 GC wheel loader
Caterpillar Caterpillar 950 GC
Komatsu WA200-8
Komatsu Komatsu WA200-8
Operating weight 18,700 kg (41,200 lb)11,000 kg (24,300 lb)
Engine power 168 kW (225 hp)95 kW (127 hp)
Net power ≈168 kW (225 hp)≈95 kW (127 hp)
Bucket capacity ≈3.1–4.2 m³ (4.0–5.5 yd³)≈1.7–2.0 m³ (2.2–2.6 yd³)
Engine Cat C7.1—
Transmission Planetary powershift—
Top speed ≈40 km/h (25 mph)—
Strengths
  • + Lower purchase price than the 950M
  • + Simple, proven powertrain
  • + Strong Cat dealer support and resale
  • + Fuel efficient
  • + Versatile
Watch-outs
  • − Fewer comfort and technology features than the standard 950
  • − Not optimised for high-production quarry work
  • − Small for quarry work
Full 950 GC reviewFull WA200-8 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.