Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Wheel loader

Caterpillar 950 GC vs Komatsu WA270-8

The Caterpillar 950 GC is about 44% heavier than the Komatsu WA270-8 (18,700 vs 13,000 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Caterpillar 950 GC has about 56% more engine power (168 kW (225 hp) vs 108 kW (145 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Komatsu in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Caterpillar 950 GC wheel loader
Caterpillar Caterpillar 950 GC
Komatsu WA270-8
Komatsu Komatsu WA270-8
Operating weight 18,700 kg (41,200 lb)13,000 kg (28,700 lb)
Engine power 168 kW (225 hp)108 kW (145 hp)
Net power ≈168 kW (225 hp)≈108 kW (145 hp)
Bucket capacity ≈3.1–4.2 m³ (4.0–5.5 yd³)≈2.3–2.5 m³ (3.0–3.3 yd³)
Engine Cat C7.1—
Transmission Planetary powershift—
Top speed ≈40 km/h (25 mph)—
Strengths
  • + Lower purchase price than the 950M
  • + Simple, proven powertrain
  • + Strong Cat dealer support and resale
  • + Hydrostatic efficiency in short cycles
  • + Good visibility
Watch-outs
  • − Fewer comfort and technology features than the standard 950
  • − Not optimised for high-production quarry work
  • − Less efficient on long hauls
Full 950 GC reviewFull WA270-8 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.