Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Wheel loader

Caterpillar 950 GC vs Komatsu WA380-8

The Caterpillar 950 GC is about 4% heavier than the Komatsu WA380-8 (18,700 vs 18,000 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Caterpillar 950 GC has about 18% more engine power (168 kW (225 hp) vs 142 kW (190 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Komatsu in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Caterpillar 950 GC wheel loader
Caterpillar Caterpillar 950 GC
Komatsu wheel loader at work
Komatsu Komatsu WA380-8
Operating weight 18,700 kg (41,200 lb)18,000 kg (39,700 lb)
Engine power 168 kW (225 hp)142 kW (190 hp)
Net power ≈168 kW (225 hp)≈142 kW (191 hp)
Bucket capacity ≈3.1–4.2 m³ (4.0–5.5 yd³)≈3.0–3.5 m³ (3.9–4.6 yd³)
Engine Cat C7.1—
Transmission Planetary powershift—
Top speed ≈40 km/h (25 mph)—
Strengths
  • + Lower purchase price than the 950M
  • + Simple, proven powertrain
  • + Strong Cat dealer support and resale
  • + Fuel-saving SmartLoader Logic
  • + Comfortable cab
  • + KOMTRAX
Watch-outs
  • − Fewer comfort and technology features than the standard 950
  • − Not optimised for high-production quarry work
  • − Mid-size bucket may need more passes for large trucks
Full 950 GC reviewFull WA380-8 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.