Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Wheel loader

Caterpillar 950 GC vs Komatsu WA470-8

The Komatsu WA470-8 is about 28% heavier than the Caterpillar 950 GC (24,000 vs 18,700 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Komatsu WA470-8 has about 21% more engine power (203 kW (272 hp) vs 168 kW (225 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Komatsu in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Caterpillar 950 GC wheel loader
Caterpillar Caterpillar 950 GC
Komatsu WA470-8
Komatsu Komatsu WA470-8
Operating weight 18,700 kg (41,200 lb)24,000 kg (52,900 lb)
Engine power 168 kW (225 hp)203 kW (272 hp)
Net power ≈168 kW (225 hp)≈203 kW (272 hp)
Bucket capacity ≈3.1–4.2 m³ (4.0–5.5 yd³)≈4.2–5.0 m³ (5.5–6.5 yd³)
Engine Cat C7.1—
Transmission Planetary powershift—
Top speed ≈40 km/h (25 mph)—
Strengths
  • + Lower purchase price than the 950M
  • + Simple, proven powertrain
  • + Strong Cat dealer support and resale
  • + Productive
  • + Comfortable cab
Watch-outs
  • − Fewer comfort and technology features than the standard 950
  • − Not optimised for high-production quarry work
  • − Premium price
Full 950 GC reviewFull WA470-8 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.