Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Wheel loader

Caterpillar 950 GC vs Komatsu WA600-8

The Komatsu WA600-8 is about 194% heavier than the Caterpillar 950 GC (55,000 vs 18,700 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Komatsu WA600-8 has about 134% more engine power (393 kW (527 hp) vs 168 kW (225 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Komatsu in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Caterpillar 950 GC wheel loader
Caterpillar Caterpillar 950 GC
Komatsu WA600-8
Komatsu Komatsu WA600-8
Operating weight 18,700 kg (41,200 lb)55,000 kg (121,300 lb)
Engine power 168 kW (225 hp)393 kW (527 hp)
Net power ≈168 kW (225 hp)≈393 kW (527 hp)
Bucket capacity ≈3.1–4.2 m³ (4.0–5.5 yd³)≈6.4–7.6 m³ (8.4–9.9 yd³)
Engine Cat C7.1—
Transmission Planetary powershift—
Top speed ≈40 km/h (25 mph)—
Strengths
  • + Lower purchase price than the 950M
  • + Simple, proven powertrain
  • + Strong Cat dealer support and resale
  • + High productivity
  • + Dual-mode operation
Watch-outs
  • − Fewer comfort and technology features than the standard 950
  • − Not optimised for high-production quarry work
  • − Large fuel consumption
Full 950 GC reviewFull WA600-8 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.