Comparison · Wheel loader
Caterpillar 950 GC vs LiuGong 835H
The Caterpillar 950 GC is about 72% heavier than the LiuGong 835H (18,700 vs 10,900 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Caterpillar 950 GC has about 83% more engine power (168 kW (225 hp) vs 92 kW (123 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and LiuGong in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 18,700 kg (41,200 lb) | 10,900 kg (24,000 lb) |
| Engine power | 168 kW (225 hp) | 92 kW (123 hp) |
| Net power | ≈168 kW (225 hp) | — |
| Bucket capacity | ≈3.1–4.2 m³ (4.0–5.5 yd³) | ≈1.8 m³ (2.4 yd³) |
| Engine | Cat C7.1 | — |
| Transmission | Planetary powershift | — |
| Top speed | ≈40 km/h (25 mph) | — |
| Engine power | — | ≈92 kW (123 hp) |
| Rated load | — | ≈3,000 kg (6,600 lb) |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 950 GC review | Full 835H review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.