Comparison · Wheel loader
Caterpillar 950 GC vs LiuGong 856H
The Caterpillar 950 GC is about 7% heavier than the LiuGong 856H (18,700 vs 17,500 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Caterpillar 950 GC has about 4% more engine power (168 kW (225 hp) vs 162 kW (217 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and LiuGong in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 18,700 kg (41,200 lb) | 17,500 kg (38,600 lb) |
| Engine power | 168 kW (225 hp) | 162 kW (217 hp) |
| Net power | ≈168 kW (225 hp) | — |
| Bucket capacity | ≈3.1–4.2 m³ (4.0–5.5 yd³) | ≈3.0 m³ (3.9 yd³) |
| Engine | Cat C7.1 | — |
| Transmission | Planetary powershift | — |
| Top speed | ≈40 km/h (25 mph) | — |
| Engine power | — | ≈162 kW (217 hp) |
| Rated load | — | ≈5,000 kg (11,000 lb) |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 950 GC review | Full 856H review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.