Comparison · Wheel loader
Caterpillar 950 GC vs Volvo L150H
The Volvo L150H is about 34% heavier than the Caterpillar 950 GC (25,000 vs 18,700 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Volvo L150H has about 32% more engine power (222 kW (298 hp) vs 168 kW (225 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 18,700 kg (41,200 lb) | 25,000 kg (55,100 lb) |
| Engine power | 168 kW (225 hp) | 222 kW (298 hp) |
| Net power | ≈168 kW (225 hp) | ≈222 kW (298 hp) |
| Bucket capacity | ≈3.1–4.2 m³ (4.0–5.5 yd³) | ≈3.4–8.0 m³ (4.4–10.5 yd³) |
| Engine | Cat C7.1 | — |
| Transmission | Planetary powershift | — |
| Top speed | ≈40 km/h (25 mph) | — |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 950 GC review | Full L150H review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.