Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Wheel loader

Caterpillar 950 GC vs Volvo L220H

The Volvo L220H is about 79% heavier than the Caterpillar 950 GC (33,500 vs 18,700 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Volvo L220H has about 55% more engine power (260 kW (349 hp) vs 168 kW (225 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Caterpillar 950 GC wheel loader
Caterpillar Caterpillar 950 GC
Volvo machine similar to the Volvo L220H (related model may be pictured)
Volvo Construction Equipment Volvo L220H
Operating weight 18,700 kg (41,200 lb)33,500 kg (73,900 lb)
Engine power 168 kW (225 hp)260 kW (349 hp)
Net power ≈168 kW (225 hp)≈260 kW (349 hp)
Bucket capacity ≈3.1–4.2 m³ (4.0–5.5 yd³)≈4.0–9.0 m³ (5.2–11.8 yd³)
Engine Cat C7.1—
Transmission Planetary powershift—
Top speed ≈40 km/h (25 mph)—
Strengths
  • + Lower purchase price than the 950M
  • + Simple, proven powertrain
  • + Strong Cat dealer support and resale
  • + High productivity
  • + Durable
Watch-outs
  • − Fewer comfort and technology features than the standard 950
  • − Not optimised for high-production quarry work
  • − Heavy transport
Full 950 GC reviewFull L220H review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.