Comparison · Wheel loader
Caterpillar 950 GC vs Volvo L60H
The Caterpillar 950 GC is about 59% heavier than the Volvo L60H (18,700 vs 11,750 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Caterpillar 950 GC has about 68% more engine power (168 kW (225 hp) vs 100 kW (134 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 18,700 kg (41,200 lb) | 11,750 kg (25,900 lb) |
| Engine power | 168 kW (225 hp) | 100 kW (134 hp) |
| Net power | ≈168 kW (225 hp) | ≈100 kW (134 hp) |
| Bucket capacity | ≈3.1–4.2 m³ (4.0–5.5 yd³) | ≈1.8–2.5 m³ (2.4–3.3 yd³) |
| Engine | Cat C7.1 | — |
| Transmission | Planetary powershift | — |
| Top speed | ≈40 km/h (25 mph) | — |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 950 GC review | Full L60H review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.