Comparison · Wheel loader
Caterpillar 950 GC vs Volvo L90H
The Caterpillar 950 GC is about 19% heavier than the Volvo L90H (18,700 vs 15,750 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Caterpillar 950 GC has about 30% more engine power (168 kW (225 hp) vs 129 kW (173 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 18,700 kg (41,200 lb) | 15,750 kg (34,700 lb) |
| Engine power | 168 kW (225 hp) | 129 kW (173 hp) |
| Net power | ≈168 kW (225 hp) | ≈129 kW (173 hp) |
| Bucket capacity | ≈3.1–4.2 m³ (4.0–5.5 yd³) | ≈2.5–3.5 m³ (3.3–4.6 yd³) |
| Engine | Cat C7.1 | — |
| Transmission | Planetary powershift | — |
| Top speed | ≈40 km/h (25 mph) | — |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 950 GC review | Full L90H review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.