Comparison · Wheel loader
Caterpillar 966 vs Caterpillar 980
The Caterpillar 980 is about 31% heavier than the Caterpillar 966 (31,000 vs 23,750 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Caterpillar 980 has about 25% more engine power (276 kW (370 hp) vs 221 kW (296 hp)).
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 23,750 kg (52,400 lb) | 31,000 kg (68,300 lb) |
| Engine power | 221 kW (296 hp) | 276 kW (370 hp) |
| Net power | ≈221 kW (296 hp) | ≈276 kW (370 hp) |
| Bucket capacity | ≈3.8–5.0 m³ (5.0–6.5 yd³) | ≈5.4–7.0 m³ (7.0–9.2 yd³) |
| Engine | Cat C9.3B | — |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 966 review | Full 980 review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.