Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Wheel loader

Caterpillar 966 vs Hitachi ZW220-7

The Caterpillar 966 is about 32% heavier than the Hitachi ZW220-7 (23,750 vs 18,000 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Caterpillar 966 has about 52% more engine power (221 kW (296 hp) vs 145 kW (194 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Hitachi in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Caterpillar 966C wheel loader (an earlier generation of the 966)
Caterpillar Caterpillar 966
Hitachi ZW220 wheel loader
Hitachi Hitachi ZW220-7
Operating weight 23,750 kg (52,400 lb)18,000 kg (39,700 lb)
Engine power 221 kW (296 hp)145 kW (194 hp)
Net power ≈221 kW (296 hp)≈145 kW (195 hp)
Bucket capacity ≈3.8–5.0 m³ (5.0–6.5 yd³)≈3.3 m³ (4.3 yd³), standard
Engine Cat C9.3BCummins QSB6.7
Transmission —5-speed powershift with lock-up
Strengths
  • + XE version with CVT for fuel savings
  • + Payload weighing options
  • + Strong resale
  • + Good visibility with a curved front cab
  • + Lock-up torque converter for fuel saving on hauls
  • + Durable build
Watch-outs
  • − Premium price
  • − Less common than Cat, Volvo and Komatsu, so fewer used machines
  • − Dealer network smaller in some markets
Full 966 reviewFull ZW220-7 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.