Comparison · Wheel loader
Caterpillar 966 vs JCB 457
The Caterpillar 966 is about 25% heavier than the JCB 457 (23,750 vs 19,000 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Caterpillar 966 has about 19% more engine power (221 kW (296 hp) vs 186 kW (249 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and JCB in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 23,750 kg (52,400 lb) | 19,000 kg (41,900 lb) |
| Engine power | 221 kW (296 hp) | 186 kW (249 hp) |
| Net power | ≈221 kW (296 hp) | — |
| Bucket capacity | ≈3.8–5.0 m³ (5.0–6.5 yd³) | ≈3.3–4.2 m³ (4.3–5.5 yd³) |
| Engine | Cat C9.3B | — |
| Engine power | — | ≈186 kW (250 hp) |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 966 review | Full 457 review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.