Comparison · Wheel loader
Caterpillar 966 vs Komatsu WA200-8
The Caterpillar 966 is about 116% heavier than the Komatsu WA200-8 (23,750 vs 11,000 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Caterpillar 966 has about 133% more engine power (221 kW (296 hp) vs 95 kW (127 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Komatsu in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 23,750 kg (52,400 lb) | 11,000 kg (24,300 lb) |
| Engine power | 221 kW (296 hp) | 95 kW (127 hp) |
| Net power | ≈221 kW (296 hp) | ≈95 kW (127 hp) |
| Bucket capacity | ≈3.8–5.0 m³ (5.0–6.5 yd³) | ≈1.7–2.0 m³ (2.2–2.6 yd³) |
| Engine | Cat C9.3B | — |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 966 review | Full WA200-8 review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.