Comparison · Wheel loader
Caterpillar 966 vs Komatsu WA380-8
The Caterpillar 966 is about 32% heavier than the Komatsu WA380-8 (23,750 vs 18,000 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Caterpillar 966 has about 56% more engine power (221 kW (296 hp) vs 142 kW (190 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Komatsu in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 23,750 kg (52,400 lb) | 18,000 kg (39,700 lb) |
| Engine power | 221 kW (296 hp) | 142 kW (190 hp) |
| Net power | ≈221 kW (296 hp) | ≈142 kW (191 hp) |
| Bucket capacity | ≈3.8–5.0 m³ (5.0–6.5 yd³) | ≈3.0–3.5 m³ (3.9–4.6 yd³) |
| Engine | Cat C9.3B | — |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 966 review | Full WA380-8 review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.