Comparison · Wheel loader
Caterpillar 966 vs LiuGong 835H
The Caterpillar 966 is about 118% heavier than the LiuGong 835H (23,750 vs 10,900 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Caterpillar 966 has about 140% more engine power (221 kW (296 hp) vs 92 kW (123 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and LiuGong in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 23,750 kg (52,400 lb) | 10,900 kg (24,000 lb) |
| Engine power | 221 kW (296 hp) | 92 kW (123 hp) |
| Net power | ≈221 kW (296 hp) | — |
| Bucket capacity | ≈3.8–5.0 m³ (5.0–6.5 yd³) | ≈1.8 m³ (2.4 yd³) |
| Engine | Cat C9.3B | — |
| Engine power | — | ≈92 kW (123 hp) |
| Rated load | — | ≈3,000 kg (6,600 lb) |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 966 review | Full 835H review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.