Comparison · Wheel loader
Caterpillar 966 vs LiuGong 856H
The Caterpillar 966 is about 36% heavier than the LiuGong 856H (23,750 vs 17,500 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Caterpillar 966 has about 36% more engine power (221 kW (296 hp) vs 162 kW (217 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and LiuGong in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 23,750 kg (52,400 lb) | 17,500 kg (38,600 lb) |
| Engine power | 221 kW (296 hp) | 162 kW (217 hp) |
| Net power | ≈221 kW (296 hp) | — |
| Bucket capacity | ≈3.8–5.0 m³ (5.0–6.5 yd³) | ≈3.0 m³ (3.9 yd³) |
| Engine | Cat C9.3B | — |
| Engine power | — | ≈162 kW (217 hp) |
| Rated load | — | ≈5,000 kg (11,000 lb) |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 966 review | Full 856H review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.