Comparison · Wheel loader
Caterpillar 966 vs Volvo L220H
The Volvo L220H is about 41% heavier than the Caterpillar 966 (33,500 vs 23,750 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Volvo L220H has about 18% more engine power (260 kW (349 hp) vs 221 kW (296 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 23,750 kg (52,400 lb) | 33,500 kg (73,900 lb) |
| Engine power | 221 kW (296 hp) | 260 kW (349 hp) |
| Net power | ≈221 kW (296 hp) | ≈260 kW (349 hp) |
| Bucket capacity | ≈3.8–5.0 m³ (5.0–6.5 yd³) | ≈4.0–9.0 m³ (5.2–11.8 yd³) |
| Engine | Cat C9.3B | — |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 966 review | Full L220H review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.