Comparison · Wheel loader
Caterpillar 966 vs Volvo L60H
The Caterpillar 966 is about 102% heavier than the Volvo L60H (23,750 vs 11,750 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Caterpillar 966 has about 121% more engine power (221 kW (296 hp) vs 100 kW (134 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 23,750 kg (52,400 lb) | 11,750 kg (25,900 lb) |
| Engine power | 221 kW (296 hp) | 100 kW (134 hp) |
| Net power | ≈221 kW (296 hp) | ≈100 kW (134 hp) |
| Bucket capacity | ≈3.8–5.0 m³ (5.0–6.5 yd³) | ≈1.8–2.5 m³ (2.4–3.3 yd³) |
| Engine | Cat C9.3B | — |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 966 review | Full L60H review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.