Comparison · Wheel loader
Caterpillar 966 vs Volvo L90H
The Caterpillar 966 is about 51% heavier than the Volvo L90H (23,750 vs 15,750 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Caterpillar 966 has about 71% more engine power (221 kW (296 hp) vs 129 kW (173 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 23,750 kg (52,400 lb) | 15,750 kg (34,700 lb) |
| Engine power | 221 kW (296 hp) | 129 kW (173 hp) |
| Net power | ≈221 kW (296 hp) | ≈129 kW (173 hp) |
| Bucket capacity | ≈3.8–5.0 m³ (5.0–6.5 yd³) | ≈2.5–3.5 m³ (3.3–4.6 yd³) |
| Engine | Cat C9.3B | — |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 966 review | Full L90H review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.