Comparison · Wheel loader
Caterpillar 994K vs Volvo L120H
The Caterpillar 994K is about 888% heavier than the Volvo L120H (200,000 vs 20,250 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Caterpillar 994K has about 589% more engine power (1377 kW (1847 hp) vs 200 kW (268 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 200,000 kg (440,900 lb) | 20,250 kg (44,600 lb) |
| Engine power | 1377 kW (1847 hp) | 200 kW (268 hp) |
| Gross power | ≈1,377 kW (1,847 hp) | — |
| Bucket capacity | ≈19–43 m³ (25–56 yd³) | ≈3.0–7.0 m³ (3.9–9.2 yd³), depending on material |
| Net power | — | ≈200 kW (268 hp) |
| Engine | — | Volvo D8J |
| Linkage | — | Volvo TP (torque parallel) |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 994K review | Full L120H review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.