Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Bulldozer

Komatsu D475A-8 vs Liebherr PR 776

The Komatsu D475A-8 is about 59% heavier than the Liebherr PR 776 (115,300 vs 72,495 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Komatsu D475A-8 has about 18% more engine power (664 kW (890 hp) vs 565 kW (758 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Komatsu and Liebherr in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Komatsu D475A-8 bulldozer
Komatsu Komatsu D475A-8
Liebherr machine similar to the Liebherr PR 776 (related model may be pictured)
Liebherr Liebherr PR 776
Operating weight 115,300 kg (254,200 lb)72,495 kg (159,800 lb)
Engine power 664 kW (890 hp)565 kW (758 hp)
Net power – forward 664 kW (890 hp) at 2,000 rpm—
Net power – reverse 722 kW (968 hp) at 2,000 rpm—
Semi-U 27.2 m³ (35.6 yd³)—
U 34.4 m³ (44.5 yd³)—
Super dozer 45.0 m³ (58.9 yd³)—
Engine power —565 kW (768 hp)
Blade capacity —18.5–22 m³ (semi-U 23.5 yd³ / U 28.8 yd³)
Drive —Hydrostatic
Class —Mining dozer
Strengths
  • + Komatsu’s largest and most productive dozer
  • + Re-engineered for longer component life (2021)
  • + Higher reverse power for faster cycles
  • + Super dozer blade for maximum volume
  • + Hydrostatic drive at mining scale — no gear shifts, full-power turns
  • + High productivity per litre (Liebherr claims for hydrostatic efficiency)
  • + New G8 generation
Watch-outs
  • − Mining-scale costs and logistics
  • − Mining-scale costs
  • − Fewer units in service than Cat or Komatsu mining dozers
Full D475A-8 reviewFull PR 776 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.