Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Bulldozer

Komatsu D65EX-18 vs Liebherr PR 736

The Komatsu D65EX-18 has about 8% more engine power (162 kW (217 hp) vs 150 kW (201 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Komatsu and Liebherr in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Komatsu crawler dozer working on a bypass road
Komatsu Komatsu D65EX-18
Liebherr crawler dozer (PR 722 pictured)
Liebherr Liebherr PR 736
Operating weight 23,000 kg (50,700 lb)23,000 kg (50,700 lb)
Engine power 162 kW (217 hp)150 kW (201 hp)
Net power ≈162 kW (217 hp)—
Blade capacity ≈5.6 m³ (7.3 yd³), Sigmadozer—
Engine Komatsu SAA6D114E-6—
Transmission Automatic powershift with lock-up torque converter—
Engine power —≈150 kW (204 hp)
Drive —Hydrostatic
Strengths
  • + Sigmadozer blade moves more material per pass
  • + Automatic transmission with lock-up for efficiency
  • + iMC 2.0 integrated machine control option
  • + Strong reputation for durability
  • + Rear-mounted engine for visibility and balance
  • + Fuel-efficient hydrostatic drive
Watch-outs
  • − Premium pricing
  • − iMC version adds significant cost
  • − Dealer coverage weaker outside Europe
Full D65EX-18 reviewFull PR 736 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.