Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Articulated dump truck

Komatsu HM300-5 vs Volvo A40G

The Volvo A40G has about 42% more engine power (350 kW (469 hp) vs 246 kW (330 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Komatsu and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Komatsu HM300-5
Komatsu Komatsu HM300-5
Volvo A40G articulated hauler
Volvo Construction Equipment Volvo A40G
Operating weight ——
Engine power 246 kW (330 hp)350 kW (469 hp)
Rated payload ≈28,000 kg (31 US tons)≈39,000 kg (43 US tons)
Net power ≈246 kW (330 hp)≈350 kW (469 hp)
Drive 6×66×6 with automatic traction control
Body volume (heaped) —≈24 m³ (31 yd³)
Engine —Volvo D16
Top speed —≈55 km/h (34 mph)
Strengths
  • + KTCS traction control
  • + KOMTRAX
  • + Excellent traction with automatic diff locks
  • + Smooth ride with hydro-mechanical suspension
  • + Low fuel consumption per tonne
Watch-outs
  • − Smaller dealer presence in ADTs
  • − Premium price
  • − Large for tight urban sites
Full HM300-5 reviewFull A40G review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.