Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Excavator

Komatsu PC210LC-11 vs Volvo EC140E

The Komatsu PC210LC-11 is about 52% heavier than the Volvo EC140E (22,750 vs 15,000 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Komatsu PC210LC-11 has about 58% more engine power (123 kW (165 hp) vs 78 kW (105 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Komatsu and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Komatsu PC210LC crawler excavator
Komatsu Komatsu PC210LC-11
Volvo Construction Equipment Volvo EC140E
Operating weight 22,750 kg (50,200 lb)15,000 kg (33,100 lb)
Engine power 123 kW (165 hp)78 kW (105 hp)
Net power ≈123 kW (165 hp)≈78 kW (105 hp)
Max. digging depth ≈6.6 m (21 ft 8 in)≈6.0 m (19 ft 8 in)
Engine Komatsu SAA4D107E-3—
Bucket capacity 0.8–1.4 m³ (1.0–1.8 yd³)—
Max. reach at ground level ≈9.9 m (32 ft 6 in)—
Emissions EPA Tier 4 Final / EU Stage V (by market)—
Strengths
  • + Very low fuel consumption in Economy mode
  • + Smooth, precise controls favoured by operators
  • + KOMTRAX telematics fitted as standard
  • + PC210LCi version has fully integrated iMC 3D grade control
  • + Comfortable cab
  • + Good fuel economy
Watch-outs
  • − Premium price, close to Cat
  • − iMC version is significantly more expensive
  • − Dealer quality varies by region
  • − Conventional tail needs space
Full PC210LC-11 reviewFull EC140E review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.