Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Excavator

Komatsu PC210LC-11 vs Volvo EC300E

The Volvo EC300E is about 35% heavier than the Komatsu PC210LC-11 (30,750 vs 22,750 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Volvo EC300E has about 46% more engine power (180 kW (241 hp) vs 123 kW (165 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Komatsu and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Komatsu PC210LC crawler excavator
Komatsu Komatsu PC210LC-11
Volvo EC300E
Volvo Construction Equipment Volvo EC300E
Operating weight 22,750 kg (50,200 lb)30,750 kg (67,800 lb)
Engine power 123 kW (165 hp)180 kW (241 hp)
Net power ≈123 kW (165 hp)≈180 kW (241 hp)
Max. digging depth ≈6.6 m (21 ft 8 in)≈7.3 m (24 ft)
Engine Komatsu SAA4D107E-3—
Bucket capacity 0.8–1.4 m³ (1.0–1.8 yd³)—
Max. reach at ground level ≈9.9 m (32 ft 6 in)—
Emissions EPA Tier 4 Final / EU Stage V (by market)—
Strengths
  • + Very low fuel consumption in Economy mode
  • + Smooth, precise controls favoured by operators
  • + KOMTRAX telematics fitted as standard
  • + PC210LCi version has fully integrated iMC 3D grade control
  • + Efficient hydraulics
  • + Volvo Active Control option
Watch-outs
  • − Premium price, close to Cat
  • − iMC version is significantly more expensive
  • − Dealer quality varies by region
  • − Dealer coverage varies
Full PC210LC-11 reviewFull EC300E review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.