Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Compact track loader

Bobcat T770 vs Caterpillar 299D3

The Caterpillar 299D3 is about 8% heavier than the Bobcat T770 (5,200 vs 4,800 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Caterpillar 299D3 has about 6% more engine power (73 kW (98 hp) vs 69 kW (93 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Bobcat and Caterpillar in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Bobcat T770 compact track loader
Bobcat Bobcat T770
Caterpillar 289D compact track loader, the smaller sibling of the 299D3
Caterpillar Caterpillar 299D3
Operating weight 4,800 kg (10,600 lb)5,200 kg (11,500 lb)
Engine power 69 kW (93 hp)73 kW (98 hp)
Rated operating capacity ≈1,580 kg (3,475 lb)≈1,300 kg (2,900 lb) at 35% tipping load
Engine power ≈69 kW (92 hp)—
Lift path VerticalVertical
Engine Bobcat / Doosan 3.4 LCat C3.8
Net power —≈73 kW (98 hp); XE versions up to ≈82 kW (110 hp)
Strengths
  • + High lift capacity and strong pushing power
  • + Huge attachment ecosystem
  • + Plenty of used machines and parts
  • + Torsion-suspended undercarriage for smooth ride
  • + High-flow XPS hydraulics on XE models
  • + Excellent operator environment
Watch-outs
  • − Replaced by the R-Series T76 / T86
  • − Track and undercarriage costs are high on a heavy machine
  • − Premium price
  • − Heavier than most competitors
Full T770 reviewFull 299D3 review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.