Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Wheel loader

Caterpillar 950 GC vs Volvo L120H

The Volvo L120H is about 8% heavier than the Caterpillar 950 GC (20,250 vs 18,700 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.

The Volvo L120H has about 19% more engine power (200 kW (268 hp) vs 168 kW (225 hp)).

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Caterpillar 950 GC wheel loader
Caterpillar Caterpillar 950 GC
Volvo H-series wheel loader on display at Bauma
Volvo Construction Equipment Volvo L120H
Operating weight 18,700 kg (41,200 lb)20,250 kg (44,600 lb)
Engine power 168 kW (225 hp)200 kW (268 hp)
Net power ≈168 kW (225 hp)≈200 kW (268 hp)
Bucket capacity ≈3.1–4.2 m³ (4.0–5.5 yd³)≈3.0–7.0 m³ (3.9–9.2 yd³), depending on material
Engine Cat C7.1Volvo D8J
Transmission Planetary powershift—
Top speed ≈40 km/h (25 mph)—
Linkage —Volvo TP (torque parallel)
Strengths
  • + Lower purchase price than the 950M
  • + Simple, proven powertrain
  • + Strong Cat dealer support and resale
  • + OptiShift lock-up and reversing by braking save fuel
  • + TP linkage combines breakout force and parallel lift
  • + Excellent cab comfort
Watch-outs
  • − Fewer comfort and technology features than the standard 950
  • − Not optimised for high-production quarry work
  • − Premium price
  • − Dealer coverage varies outside Europe
Full 950 GC reviewFull L120H review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.