Comparison · Wheel loader
Caterpillar 966 vs Volvo L120H
The Caterpillar 966 is about 17% heavier than the Volvo L120H (23,750 vs 20,250 kg), which usually means more stability and lifting capacity but higher transport weight.
The Caterpillar 966 has about 10% more engine power (221 kW (296 hp) vs 200 kW (268 hp)).
Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Caterpillar and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 23,750 kg (52,400 lb) | 20,250 kg (44,600 lb) |
| Engine power | 221 kW (296 hp) | 200 kW (268 hp) |
| Net power | ≈221 kW (296 hp) | ≈200 kW (268 hp) |
| Bucket capacity | ≈3.8–5.0 m³ (5.0–6.5 yd³) | ≈3.0–7.0 m³ (3.9–9.2 yd³), depending on material |
| Engine | Cat C9.3B | Volvo D8J |
| Linkage | — | Volvo TP (torque parallel) |
| Strengths |
|
|
| Watch-outs |
|
|
| Full 966 review | Full L120H review |
Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.