Skip to content
WorksiteMachines

Comparison · Articulated dump truck

Komatsu HM400-5 vs Volvo A40G

Beyond the numbers, compare local dealer support, parts availability and resale value for Komatsu and Volvo Construction Equipment in your region: over the life of a machine they often matter more than small specification differences.

Komatsu HM400 articulated dump truck in a quarry
Komatsu Komatsu HM400-5
Volvo A40G articulated hauler
Volvo Construction Equipment Volvo A40G
Operating weight ——
Engine power 350 kW (469 hp)350 kW (469 hp)
Rated payload ≈40,000 kg (44 US tons)≈39,000 kg (43 US tons)
Net power ≈350 kW (469 hp)≈350 kW (469 hp)
Body volume (heaped) ≈24 m³ (31.4 yd³)≈24 m³ (31 yd³)
Engine Komatsu SAA6D140EVolvo D16
Drive 6×6 with KTCS6×6 with automatic traction control
Top speed —≈55 km/h (34 mph)
Strengths
  • + Komatsu Traction Control System for poor ground
  • + Automatic retarder speed control
  • + KOMTRAX telematics
  • + Excellent traction with automatic diff locks
  • + Smooth ride with hydro-mechanical suspension
  • + Low fuel consumption per tonne
Watch-outs
  • − Smaller dealer presence in ADTs than Volvo and Cat in some regions
  • − Premium price
  • − Large for tight urban sites
Full HM400-5 reviewFull A40G review

Specifications are typical figures for standard configurations and may be measured differently by each manufacturer (for example net vs gross power). Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer. Build another comparison.